Self Control Project


Blog Coordinator

« Jennifer Nagel and Joshua Alexander on Philosophy TV | Main | Where the action is »

04/26/2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Denise Cummins

Well, this reviewer certainly has demonstrated his or her bias on the subject of experimental psychology. No agreement on effects or principles? Might want to check out some textbooks on cognitive psychology or learning and memory. I also suggest that he or she read these articles:

http://www.jove.com/blog/2012/05/03/studies-show-only-10-of-published-science-articles-are-reproducible-what-is-happening

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/infinity-logic-law/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1367183/posts

Robert Cummins

Years ago, I criticized arm chair philosophy--what the reviewer calls "language based analytic philosophy"--on the grounds that it cannot be calibrated, is subject to order effects (in considering linguistic or other intuitions), and to selection effects. This reviewers wants to select against your paper on the grounds that it does not employ a discredited methodology.

The comments to this entry are closed.

New Journal: Ergo


3QD Prize


Knobe's X-Phi Page